Klin Farmakol Farm. 2026;40(2):102-107 | DOI: 10.36290/far.2026.022

Inclusivity in clinical trials: barriers and their potentional solutions

Hana Kocourková1, Jitka Rychlíčková1, 2
1 Farmakologický ústav, Lékařská fakulta, Masarykova univerzita, Brno
2 Fakultní nemocnice u sv. Anny v Brně

Inclusivity in clinical research is an important prerequisite for obtaining relevant results applicable to routine clinical practice. Clinical research should therefore include partici­pants who accurately represent the target population across a range of characteristics. However, certain patient groups remain under-represented in clinical trials. The so called under-served populations often include older adults, ethnic minorities, patients with multiple comorbidities, and socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals. Their limited participation may be due to methodological and organizational barriers inherent in the study design. This review article addresses the topic of under-served populations in clinical trials. It identifies the main barriers to the inclusion of these populations, and sumarizes approaches that can contribute to increasing inclusivity in clinical research in general.

Keywords: inclusivity, diversity, clinical research, underserved populations, trial methodology.

Received: March 25, 2026; Revised: June 3, 2026; Accepted: June 3, 2026; Published: July 1, 2026  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kocourková H, Rychlíčková J. Inclusivity in clinical trials: barriers and their potentional solutions. Klin Farmakol Farm. 2026;40(2):102-107. doi: 10.36290/far.2026.022.
Download citation

References

  1. Langley B, Talas S, El-Shakankery KH, et al. Improving inclusivity, equity, and diversity in oncology clinical trials: a European perspective. EMJ Oncol. 2023;68:80. Go to original source...
  2. Jensen JU, Johansen ND, Mathioudakis AG, et al. The silent exclusion: rethinking eligibility and generalizability in clinical trials. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2025;61:101605. Go to original source...
  3. Versavel S, Subasinghe A, Johnson K, et al. Diversity, equity, and inclusion in clinical trials: A practical guide from the perspective of a trial sponsor. Contemp Clin Trials. 2023;126:107092. Go to original source...
  4. Witham MD, Anderson E, Carroll C, et al. Developing a roadmap to improve trial delivery for under-served groups: results from a UK multi-stakeholder process. Trials. 2020;21(1):694. Go to original source...
  5. Hussain-Gambles M. Ethnic minority under-representation in clinical trials: Whose responsibility is it anyway? J Health Organ Manag. 2003;17(2):138-143. Go to original source...
  6. Kim JY, Florez M, Botto E, et al. The influence of socioeconomic status on individual attitudes and experience with clinical trials. Commun Med. 2024;4(1):172. Go to original source...
  7. Biggs K, Dix C, Shiely F, et al. Effective interventions to increase representation of under-served groups in randomised trials in UK and Ireland: a scoping literature review. NIHR Open Res. 2024;4:12. Go to original source...
  8. Papiež A, Čechová Z, Rychlíčková J. Rozdíly mezi pohlavími - od farmakologie až po metodologii klinického výzkumu. Klin Farmakol Farm. 2025;39(1):52-56. Go to original source...
  9. Snyder RA, Burtness B, Cho M, et al. The room where it happens: addressing diversity, equity, and inclusion in National Clinical Trials Network clinical trial leadership. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2023;115(10):1132-1138. Go to original source...
  10. Washington V, Franklin JB, Huang ES, et al. Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Clinical Research: A Path Toward Precision Health for Everyone. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2023;113(3):575-584. Go to original source...
  11. Espinoza-Gutarra MR, Aiello J, Orlowski RZ, et al. Clinical trial design change implementation for inclusive studies. Lancet Haematol. 2023;10(12):e953-954. Go to original source...
  12. Gedela K, Wong R, Balendra S, et al. Embedding equity, diversity and inclusion processes within clinical trials and health and social care research. BMJ Open. 2025;15(3):e091807. Go to original source...
  13. Le-Rademacher J, Gunn H, Yao X, et al. Clinical Trials Overview: From Explanatory to Pragmatic Clinical Trials. Mayo Clin Proc. 2023;98(8):1241-1253. Go to original source...
  14. Esteban I, Carvalho Ferreira J, Patino CM. Why is conducting pragmatic clinical trials so important? J Bras Pneumol. 2022;e20220397. Go to original source...
  15. Stern AD, Trusheim M. Transformation of the clinical trial enterprise: lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic: final report [Internet]. Washington (DC): Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE); 2024 [cited 15. březen 2026]. (HHS ASPE Reports). Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK609006/.
  16. National Institute for Health Research. Guidance on Co-Producing a Research Project [Internet]. Learning for Involvement; 2021 [cited 15. březen 2026]. Available from: https://www.learningforinvolvement.org.uk/content/resource/nihr-guidance-on-co-producing-a-research-project/.
  17. Price A, Clarke M, Staniszewska S, et al. Patient and public involvement in research: a journey to co-production. Patient Educ Couns. 2022;105(4):1041-1047. Go to original source...
  18. Gobat N, Slack C, Hannah S, et al. Better engagement, better evidence: working in partnership with patients, the public, and communities in clinical trials with involvement and good participatory practice. Lancet Glob Health. 2025;13(4):e716-731. Go to original source...
  19. Majid U. The dimensions of tokenism in patient and family engagement: a concept analysis of the literature. J Patient Exp. 2020;7(6):1610-1620. Go to original source...
  20. World Health Organization. New global guidance puts forward recommendations for more effective and equitable clinical trials [Internet]. 2024 [cited 15. březen 2026]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news/item/25-09-2024-new-global-guidance-puts-forward-recommendations-for-more-effective-and-equitable-clinical-trials.
  21. Rawlins L, Dilley J, Fajardo M. Action plans on diversity: key requirements for certain clinical studies [Internet]. Boston (MA): Foley Hoag LLP; 2024 [cited 15. březen 2026]. Available from: https://foleyhoag.com/news-and-insights/publications/alerts-and-updates/2024/july/action-plans-on-diversity-key-requirements-for-certain-clinical-studies/.
  22. Biomapas. Diversity in clinical trials: a European perspective on global progress and strategies [Internet]. 2025 [cited 15. březen 2026]. Available from: https://www.biomapas.com/diversity-in-clinical-trials-a-european-perspective-on-global-progress-and-strategies-blog/.
  23. University College Cork. SENSITISE - Inclusive Clinical Trials [Internet]. 2025 [cited 23. březen 2026]. Available from: https://www.ucc.ie/en/sensitise/.




Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.